1. Chapter News: Meet
the FLOWER Patrol
By Jane Tseng
DanceSafe FLOWER, Pittsburgh's DanceSafe chapter,
has been one of the most successful and organized chapters
since it formed a year ago this month. E-News spoke with FLOWER
founder and president Heather McCoy to find out the secret
to FLOWER's success.
E-News: What has made FLOWER so successful?
McCoy: The volunteers and all the different areas they
came from. They all came from a different background and brought
something with them. All the different types of people definitely
made us what we are.
E-News: In the very beginning of FLOWER, did you have
any problems with group structure or working out what the
responsibilities of new volunteers would be?
McCoy: We started as five people and I wouldn't let
anyone else join until we got through how we were going to
structure it. Before we let any new people join we had everything
mapped out so I knew the rules that we needed to abide by.
E-News: How many volunteers do you have now?
McCoy: We have 25-30 active volunteers, and we also
have a lot of alumni now. People that are no longer active
members move on to the alumni list.
E-News: How does FLOWER keep so many volunteers organized?
McCoy: For our volunteers, we use laminated tags. On
the front we have our logo, and on the back we have the mission
statement, bylaws, and their signature. The tags give people
the status of being a FLOWER member, but this also comes with
responsibility. The tags say that if the wearers violate any
of the chapter bylaws, or if they were to do drugs at that
party, they could get kicked out on the spot. We use a color-coded
tee shirt system as well. People who have orange FLOWER shirts
are thought of differently than people that have just have
the FLOWER patrol laminates. We are also dividing our group
one more way. People that have an EMS certification will be
able wear the blue FLOWER shirts. So I have a lot of kids
going for the certification so that they can wear blue FLOWER
shirts instead of orange FLOWER shirts. It sounds unnecessary,
but I like to have people as educated as possible. A lot of
our volunteers are already CPR/First Aid certified.
E-News: How does FLOWER pay for its materials?
McCoy: We get a lot of donations from running coat
checks. We make candy bracelets to sell. We also have someone
working on grants.
E-News: Flower is getting office space soon. How will
this expand your services?
McCoy: We will have office hours two days a week, and
there is a separate conference hall that we can use for meetings.
People can come to us with questions during office hours,
or anything else that they need. We're hopefully also going
to start doing oral AIDS testing. We're working on doing it
at the booth and people will be able to pick up their results
at the office, but they can also just come and get tested
at the office.
E-News: Where does FLOWER get its safe sex materials?
McCoy: We get a lot of it from the Pittsburgh Aids
Task force. But for everything else, our volunteers pick up
literature, and I just call and ask if we can use it.
E-News: What is the most rewarding thing about being
a part of FLOWER?
McCoy: Making people excited about doing harm reduction.
After a meeting, people are so psyched. They have so much
energy and they want to go out and do so much. You can just
see it in their eyes that what you're doing is something they
really want to be a part of. FLOWER is on the web at www.euphoricflower.com.
To find other DanceSafe chapters, see www.dancesafe.org/findachapter.html.
If you're interested in starting a chapter in your area, visit
www.dancesafe.org/startachapter.html
to learn how.
2. Counter-Review: "Traffic"
By Mike Males
Note: Mike Males contacted us after we ran a positive
review of the movie "Traffic" in last week's issue (you can
read it in here).
We're sure you'll find his take on the film as thought- provoking
as we do. Write us at editor@dancesafe.org
and let us know what you think. --Eds.
ItÕs puzzling that reformers promoting rational drug policies
champion Steven Soderbergh's "Traffic," a film so incoherent
and anachronistic that hardliners like Senator Orrin Hatch
(R-Utah, who cameos) also laud it. "Traffic," like the War
on Drugs itself, is hopelessly mired in 1970 Baby-Boom imagery
that has little to do with todayÕs realities. Indeed, "Traffic"
upholds three cherished drug war myths that teenage drug abuse
is a hidden scourge, legal drugs such as alcohol are a side
issue, and drastic tactics (including illegal surveillance)
are justified against drug suppliers menacing our youth.
"Traffic" chronicles a newly appointed drug czar disillusioned
by the War on Drugsâ corrupt brutality and failure to curb
drug addiction, exemplified by his teenage daughterÕs heroin
habit. This latter image might have been apt 30 years ago,
when the Vietnam War spawned a real heroin crisis among young
adults against a backdrop of booze and barbiturate popping
by grownups, but it has little relevance today. Despite vigorous
scare campaigns by modern drug war interests to fabricate
a suburban teenage heroin epidemic stoked by black inner-city
junkies (a fiction "Traffic" upholds), thereÕs no teenage
heroin crisis, suburban or otherwise. The latest Drug Abuse
Warning Network reports released in December 2000 show that
of 84,000 hospital emergency treatments for heroin, just 700
were adolescents; of 4,300 heroin deaths, only 23 were teens.
The newest National Household Survey of 25,000 youths age
12-17 found only 75 used heroin at any time in the previous
year.
Heroin is the plague of aging Baby Boomers. Today, 90% of
heroin addicts and overdosers are over age 30; most are white.
If "Traffic" sought realism, it would highlight the middle-aged
hard-drug crisis, the worst in our history, as proof of the
drug war's failure. (That is, after all, the situation Dutch
reformers confronted to win marijuana decriminalization and
public health management of older addicts). If a realistic
"Traffic" depicted teens at all, they would be coping with
a drug epidemic among their upscale 40-age parents while the
kids occasionally socialized with marijuana or beer, same
as the drug czar and grizzled peers unwinding with scotch.
But the myth that Baby-Boom dope dabbling is long past and
todayÕs Boomer Burden is to rescue our drug-craving kids (by
"war" or by "treatment") has crowded out rational debate.
Both and drug warriors and many drug-policy reformers exploit
fear of adolescent druggies to advance their agendas. "TrafficÕs
most dubious assertion is that legal grownup drinking, while
hypocritical, incorporates practical safeguards: the teenage
daughter doesn't drink because "for someone my age, itÕs easier
to get drugs than alcohol." Many drug reformers champion this
misnomer to support claims that decriminalizing and regulating
marijuana for grownups would reduce teenage access. Right.
The National Household Survey shows 100 times more teenagers
drink alcohol than use heroin; two to three times more teens
patronize legal, regulated drugs such as beer and cigarettes
than the most popular illicit, marijuana. While teenage alcohol
abuse is drastically overstated (high schoolers are safer
from drunken mishap than their parents), it is far worse than
teenage illegal-drug abuse. If marijuana were legalized, teenage
pot smoking would probably rise at the expense of drinking,
hardly a terrifying prospect.
The images in "Traffic," like the modern drug debate, reflect
1970s "first generation" symbols of functioning alcohol- and
pill-medicated grownups versus imperiled illegal-drug- abusing
kids. The policies pushed by the drug war (punishing attacks
on "gateway" soft-drug use mainly by young people) and drug
reformers (legalizing drugs for grownups while demanding abstinence
by teenagers) are completely mismatched to todayÕs "second
generation" landscape of epidemic hard-drug addiction among
30-50-agers versus safer (if not completely safe) soft-drug
usage by teens and young adults.
Drug wars ultimately are wars on unpopular populations --
the Chinese and opium, Mexicans and marijuana, the inner-city
poor and crack or heroin, now teenagers and whatever drug
du jour they're supposedly gobbling. By projecting the fable
of clandestine teenage heroin and other drug epidemics, "Traffic"
and drug-reformers commit a fundamental error they reinforce
fear of youth that strengthens the War on Drugs and dashes
hopes for reasoned drug policy.
--Mike Males is senior researcher for the Justice
Policy Institute sociology instructor at UC Santa Cruz,
and author of three books and numerous articles on adolescent
issues. You can read selected examples of his work online
at home.earthlink.net/~mmales/
3. The Facts About
DXM
The DXM page was recently revised on
the DanceSafe web site.
4. Media Action Alert!
Tell the NY Times What You Think About "Experiencing Ecstasy"
The following is a link to "Experiencing Ecstasy," the cover
article from the January 21, 2001 issue of the New York Times
Magazine: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n122/a04.html?189
In the article, author Matthew Klam provides a fresh, balanced
perspective on the physical and psychological effects of Ecstasy.
The article is an oasis of sensibility in the current climate
of sensationalist and alarmist "club drug" reporting. The
news media is often under pressure to print slanted stories
that demonize drugs and drug users at the expense of the truth.
The Times is likely to hear from many who think the only good
drug story is a drug scare story. It's up to you to let the
Times know you appreciate their courage and honesty in publishing
Klam's story. Send your comments to magazine@nytimes.com
(you may request confidentiality, but you should include your
name, address and phone number if you want your letter considered
for publication). And please send a copy to us at editor@dancesafe.org.
5. Ecstasy Conference
to be Web Cast
Info Courtesy of The
Lindesmith Center-Drug Policy Foundation
Get into "The State of Ecstasy" Online! Wanna go to the MDMA
Conference, but gotta stay home to watch for the Groundhog's
shadow? Tune in with your computer instead! "The State of
Ecstasy: The Medicine, Science and Culture of MDMA" conference
will be webcast from the conference web site! Just visit the
website at www.drugpolicy.org/ecstasy
on February 2, 2001. Check the conference program for the
times of the speakers you want to hear, then follow the links
to the webcast and start listening. It's that easy! All you
need is RealAudio (a free download) and speakers on your computer.
So, you don't know anything about this cool conference yet?
Where have you been? This gathering of the greatest minds
in MDMA research, therapy and culture is something no one
should miss. DanceSafe founder Emanuel Sferios is speaking
on MDMA harm reduction. "Godparents of Ecstasy" Sasha and
Ann Shulgin will be speaking on the history of MDMA as a therapeutic
agent, and how it became a Schedule I drug. Dr. George Ricaurte,
whose NIDA-funded research into MDMA's neurotoxicity has caused
much of the confusion about Ecstasy's safety, will discuss
his latest research. Rick Doblin, president of the Multidisciplinary
Association of Psychedelic Studies (MAPS)
will speak on his experiences with the regulatory bodies that
keep MDMA out of the hands of responsible researchers. John
Cloud, the author of this summer's excellent Time magazine
article about Ecstasy, will speak about MDMA in the club and
rave scene. Join us for this day of intelligent discussion
about Ecstasy. I hope to see you there. But if not, you can
always listen in to the web cast! Check the web site for more
details. http//www.drugpolicy.org/ecstasy
or call the conference office in San Francisco, (415) 921-4987,
and ask for Jolayne or e-mail Jolayne at jo@harmreduction.
6. February 3, 2001
Benefit for Bay Area Chapter
Ravepic.com presents:
SuperStars: a Benefit Party for the San Francisco/Bay
Area chapter of DanceSafe on February 3rd, 2001. For more
information, visit http://ravepic.com/events.htm#super
The contents of E-News are (c)2001 DanceSafe and Respective
Authors unless otherwise noted. Permission is hereby granted
to freely reprint & reproduce DanceSafe E-News as long as
proper credit is given, including links where appropriate.
To SUBSCRIBE to DanceSafe E-News:
newsletter-subscribe@dancesafe.org
To UNSUBSCRIBE from DanceSafe E-News: newsletter-unsubscribe@dancesafe.org
For Testing Kit issues: ekits@dancesafe.org
To reach the E-News editor: editor@dancesafe.org
To reach the E-News list owner (for technical issues):
dsnews-owner@dancesafe.org
To reach the DanceSafe National Office: dsusa@dancesafe.org
Some helpful URLs:
To find a DanceSafe chapter in
your area
To purchase an Ecstasy Testing
Kit
To donate to DanceSafe